<P><STRONG>The Impact of Repealing PPACA on Savings Needed for Health Expenses for Persons Eligible for Medicare </STRONG></P> <P>New modeling by EBRI finds that Medicare beneficiaries with high levels of prescription drug use would have to save 30-40 percent more than they currently are to pay for higher drug costs if President Obama’s health reform law is repealed. Medicare beneficiaries with median prescription drug costs would not see any change in their savings targets, EBRI’s analysis finds. EBRI takes no position on whether or not the law should be repealed; rather, its analysis is designed to measure which groups would be affected and provide estimates of additional savings needed by those who would be affected if it was.</P> <P><STRONG>The Importance of Defined Benefit Plans for Retirement Income Adequacy </STRONG></P> <P>Baby Boomer and Generation X households that have a defined benefit (DB) pension plan accrual at retirement age are overall almost 12 percentage points less likely to be “at risk” of running short of money for basic needs and uninsured health costs in retirement, according to a new report by EBRI. The report finds that having a DB pension plan is particularly valuable for those with the lowest income in both age groups, but also has a “strong impact” on reducing at-risk rates for those in the middle class: Among those in the second- and third-income groups combined (covering middle-income workers), the combined relative at-risk reduction is almost 20 percent.</P>

The Impact of Repealing PPACA on Savings Needed for Health Expenses for Persons Eligible for Medicare

THE “DONUT HOLE”: In 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) added outpatient prescription drugs as an optional benefit. When the program was originally enacted, it included a controversial feature: a coverage gap, more commonly known as the “donut hole.” The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) included provisions to reduce this coverage gap.

REPEALING PPACA: This article examines the impact that repealing PPACA would have on savings targets for health care expenses in retirement. The estimates suggest that retirees with high levels of prescription drug use throughout retirement would see their savings targets increase roughly 30-40 percent were the coverage gap reduction in PPACA repealed. Individuals at the median (midpoint) level of prescription drug use throughout retirement would not see any change in savings targets.

The Importance of Defined Benefit Plans for Retirement Income Adequacy

VALUE OF DB PLANS: This article shows the tremendous importance of defined benefit plans in achieving retirement income adequacy for Baby Boomers and Gen Xers. Overall, the presence of a defined benefit accrual at age 65 reduces the “at-risk” percentage by 11.6 percentage points.

LOW- AND MIDDLE-CLASS IMPACT: The defined benefit plan advantage (as measured by the gap between the two at-risk percentages) is particularly valuable for the lowest-income quartile but also has a strong impact on the middle class (the reduction in the at-risk percentage for the second and third income quartiles combined is 9.7 percentage points).

RETIREMENT INCOME ADEQUACY: The analysis also provides additional information on how the relative value of the defined benefit accruals impact retirement income adequacy.

"The Impact of Repealing PPACA on Savings Needed for Health "Expenses for Persons Eligible for Medicare," and "The Importance of Defined Benefit Plans for Retirement Income Adequacy"

"The Impact of Repealing PPACA on Savings Needed for Health Expenses for Persons Eligible for Medicare," and "The Importance of Defined Benefit Plans for Retirement Income Adequacy"